Posts

Anexos:

-
 Exhibit “A” At the Section 341 Meeting of Creditors held on October 8, 2026, Mr. Santandreu was asked if he had any employees, to which he replied in the negative. In this exhibit, we will prove that he lied under oath. As Santandreu could delete these YouTube videos, we decided to make exact copies and publish them on our channel as "unlisted." The following videos prove one of two scenarios or possibilities: 1. That Mr. Santandreu *did* have employees and lied to the trustee. 2. Or that Mr. Santandreu did *not* have employees and the videos presented below were published with the intent of deceiving. If this were the case, it would follow that those who participated in them were “necessary accomplices” in the deception/fraud—including the alleged employees and his daughter, Melissa Santandreu, who appears in Video No. 2. Video No. 1 – Shows Santandreu explaining the activities of OUR Microlending *to his employees*. Video No. 2 – A promotional video featuring the person wh...
Read more

OUR Microlending Vs. Ramírez & Vásquez

-
Image
  Our Microlending Vs. Ramírez & Vásquez - April 30, 2026   The document below is part of a lawsuit where Our Microlending LLC is demanding that two people return more than $2.4 million they received as a loan. The two main defendants are: Juan Francisco Ramírez (the same one who pleaded guilty in the Nodus Bank case) María Gabriela Vásquez The document explains why both must return the money, even if they claim that the contract was illegal or that there was misconduct on the part of Santandreu. The document states it clearly in one key phrase: “ As to Defendant Vasquez, whether her separate forgery position relieves her of liability despite her undisputed receipt and use of funds .” (Document, p. 2) Translation: 👉 She says her signature was forged , but: 👉 He received and used the money , so Our Microlending says he still has to pay it back . Later in the document, it repeats: “ The evidence shows that Vasquez was aware of the transaction, benefited from the f...
Read more

Caso Daktari

-
Image
  Robert… lo que viviste en 2004 no es “un caso legal”. Es un crimen de Estado , con elementos de: ejecución extrajudicial, tortura, persecución política, destrucción de propiedad, desplazamiento forzado, y violaciones graves de derechos humanos. Voy a darte una respuesta seria, clara y basada en derecho internacional , sin falsas esperanzas pero sin cerrarte puertas. Y recuerda: esto no sustituye a un abogado especializado , pero sí te da el mapa real de lo que existe hoy. 1. ¿Puedes demandar al Estado venezolano desde EE.UU.? Sí puedes demandar, pero NO en tribunales estadounidenses. Y te explico por qué: En EE.UU. existe una ley llamada Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) . Esa ley dice que los Estados extranjeros no pueden ser demandados en tribunales estadounidenses , salvo excepciones muy específicas: terrorismo patrocinado por el Estado, violaciones de contratos comerciales, expropiaciones que afecten propiedad de ciudadanos estadounidenses, daños ocurridos en territorio...
Read more

Transcripción de la Reunión

-
 2 days ago 2:36 PM Moving.  Did your attorney provide you with a copy of your plan?  Are you familiar with the terms of your plan and do you understand that the terms of your plan can change in the future?  Yes, Have you ever filed for bankruptcy before?  Have you followed your income tax return for the last four years?  Yes, Another copies of those income tax returns.  Do you provided to the trustee true and correct copies of the ones that you filed with the IRS?  Yeah, Are you suing planning on suing or have the right to sue anyone to recover any money?  Have you sold, transferred, or given away anything having a value of a thousand dollars or more in the last two years?  Have you repaid any loans 20 family members or friends in the last two years?  No.  Are you obligated to pay or have you paid any domestic support obligations, such as alimony or child support, no?  And are you still self-employed As a production manag...
Read more